<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 524 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found issues with the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation of suppressed sales and income, directing a reevaluation. The estimation was to be revised using a corrected ratio, limited to specific assessment years, and the profit on undisclosed turnover set at 10%. Appeals for 1999-2000 to 2002-03 were allowed, while those for 2003-04 to 2005-06 were partly allowed. The Tribunal stressed fair consideration of all facts and legal compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 524 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found issues with the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation of suppressed sales and income, directing a reevaluation. The estimation was to be revised using a corrected ratio, limited to specific assessment years, and the profit on undisclosed turnover set at 10%. Appeals for 1999-2000 to 2002-03 were allowed, while those for 2003-04 to 2005-06 were partly allowed. The Tribunal stressed fair consideration of all facts and legal compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>