<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 521 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee is entitled to a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC as investments were made in two different financial years within the stipulated period. However, the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 on account of outstanding sundry creditors was upheld due to lack of supporting evidence from the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 521 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee is entitled to a deduction of Rs. 1 crore under Section 54EC as investments were made in two different financial years within the stipulated period. However, the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 on account of outstanding sundry creditors was upheld due to lack of supporting evidence from the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>