<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 520 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254176</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the issue of deductibility of interest paid on funds borrowed for purchasing shares of a BIFR company back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration due to lack of detailed reasoning. The Court did not specifically address the treatment of legal and professional charges for rehabilitation and revival of the BIFR company in its judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 06:44:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 520 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254176</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the issue of deductibility of interest paid on funds borrowed for purchasing shares of a BIFR company back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration due to lack of detailed reasoning. The Court did not specifically address the treatment of legal and professional charges for rehabilitation and revival of the BIFR company in its judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>