<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 508 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254164</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of Rs. 20,47,000 made under section 40(b) regarding bonus payment to the fourth partner. The tribunal found all partners were actively engaged in the business, meeting the conditions of working partners under Explanation 4 to section 40(b). The disallowance was deemed unjustified, and the tribunal directed the AO to compute interest charges consequentially. The order was pronounced on 28-02-2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 06:43:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=371017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 508 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254164</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of Rs. 20,47,000 made under section 40(b) regarding bonus payment to the fourth partner. The tribunal found all partners were actively engaged in the business, meeting the conditions of working partners under Explanation 4 to section 40(b). The disallowance was deemed unjustified, and the tribunal directed the AO to compute interest charges consequentially. The order was pronounced on 28-02-2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>