<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 497 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254153</link>
    <description>Concessional duty on imported batteries used in manufacturing mobile handsets and similar phones could not be denied where the prescribed notification conditions were satisfied and there was no allegation of diversion, non-accounting, or non-use in the intended manufacture. The objection that batteries were not an essential handset component did not justify refusing the concession, as that issue lay within customs assessment rather than central excise scrutiny. The objection based on delivery at a different address was also answered by the amended Bill of Entry. The demand was therefore unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 497 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254153</link>
      <description>Concessional duty on imported batteries used in manufacturing mobile handsets and similar phones could not be denied where the prescribed notification conditions were satisfied and there was no allegation of diversion, non-accounting, or non-use in the intended manufacture. The objection that batteries were not an essential handset component did not justify refusing the concession, as that issue lay within customs assessment rather than central excise scrutiny. The objection based on delivery at a different address was also answered by the amended Bill of Entry. The demand was therefore unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>