<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 494 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the thermite welding process for rail joints did not amount to production or processing of goods not amounting to manufacture under Section 65(105)(zzb) read with Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994. The process was deemed essential for track laying and ensuring smooth train movement, despite not yielding deliverable goods to the railway. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 26,09,242, dropped Rs. 24,29,051, and allowed the appeal, finding the service tax demand unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 494 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the thermite welding process for rail joints did not amount to production or processing of goods not amounting to manufacture under Section 65(105)(zzb) read with Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994. The process was deemed essential for track laying and ensuring smooth train movement, despite not yielding deliverable goods to the railway. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 26,09,242, dropped Rs. 24,29,051, and allowed the appeal, finding the service tax demand unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>