<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 493 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254149</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a partial waiver of demands for the period when only Scented Supari was manufactured, but required a deposit of Rs. 1 crore for a stay on recoveries until the final disposal of the appeals. The case underscores the intricacies of duty liability under the PMPM Rules and the significance of considering specific machine usage in duty calculations, emphasizing the necessity for thorough examination of issues during the final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 493 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254149</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a partial waiver of demands for the period when only Scented Supari was manufactured, but required a deposit of Rs. 1 crore for a stay on recoveries until the final disposal of the appeals. The case underscores the intricacies of duty liability under the PMPM Rules and the significance of considering specific machine usage in duty calculations, emphasizing the necessity for thorough examination of issues during the final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>