<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 491 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254147</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal denying duty demand on insurance costs incurred by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, determining that the goods were delivered at the assessee&#039;s factory gate based on evidence from lorry receipts showing the consignee as the buyer and freight on a &quot;to pay basis.&quot; The Tribunal found the recovery of insurance costs by the appellant did not change the place of removal to the customer&#039;s premises, ultimately deeming the Revenue&#039;s appeal meritless. The respondent&#039;s cross objection was also disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 13:34:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 491 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254147</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal denying duty demand on insurance costs incurred by the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision, determining that the goods were delivered at the assessee&#039;s factory gate based on evidence from lorry receipts showing the consignee as the buyer and freight on a &quot;to pay basis.&quot; The Tribunal found the recovery of insurance costs by the appellant did not change the place of removal to the customer&#039;s premises, ultimately deeming the Revenue&#039;s appeal meritless. The respondent&#039;s cross objection was also disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>