<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 255 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167261</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, setting aside penalties imposed on the parties for misdeclaration of quantity and value. Duty was ordered to be assessed based on the declared values in the invoices. The penalties under Section 112 were remitted, and refunds of excess duty collected were granted based on the declared values. Debit in the licenses should be based on the declared values in the invoices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 255 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167261</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, setting aside penalties imposed on the parties for misdeclaration of quantity and value. Duty was ordered to be assessed based on the declared values in the invoices. The penalties under Section 112 were remitted, and refunds of excess duty collected were granted based on the declared values. Debit in the licenses should be based on the declared values in the invoices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>