https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167260 The court held that the restoration of the main eviction petition reinstates all prior interlocutory orders, including those under Section 15(2) of the Act. The appellants were required to comply with these orders post-restoration, and their failure to do so justified the striking off of their defense under Section 15(7) of the Act. The High Court affirmed the decisions of the lower courts, emphasizing the consistency of these rulings with established legal principles and precedents. en-us Fri, 21 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:17:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167260 The court held that the restoration of the main eviction petition reinstates all prior interlocutory orders, including those under Section 15(2) of the Act. The appellants were required to comply with these orders post-restoration, and their failure to do so justified the striking off of their defense under Section 15(7) of the Act. The High Court affirmed the decisions of the lower courts, emphasizing the consistency of these rulings with established legal principles and precedents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167260