https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167255 Where an ad valorem duty order did not state the value of the goods, it did not by itself disclose the exact duty payable and required later clarification before liability could be computed with certainty. The later demand supplied the missing basis for quantification, so limitation could not run only from the original order. On that footing, the appeal before the Appellate Collector was held to be within time, and dismissal on limitation was incorrect. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:52:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167255 Where an ad valorem duty order did not state the value of the goods, it did not by itself disclose the exact duty payable and required later clarification before liability could be computed with certainty. The later demand supplied the missing basis for quantification, so limitation could not run only from the original order. On that footing, the appeal before the Appellate Collector was held to be within time, and dismissal on limitation was incorrect. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167255