<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 252 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167254</link>
    <description>Crankshafts imported for use in internal combustion piston engines were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 395/76 where they were shown to be meant for application in engines falling under Tariff Item No. 84.06, even if the crankshafts themselves were assessed under Tariff Item No. 84.63. The notification was read with the later clarificatory Notification No. 29-Cus./77 and prior administrative decisions, and the decisive test was intended use rather than the tariff classification of the parts themselves. On that construction, the wider exemption was applied to parts proved to be destined for the specified engines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 252 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167254</link>
      <description>Crankshafts imported for use in internal combustion piston engines were treated as eligible for exemption under Notification No. 395/76 where they were shown to be meant for application in engines falling under Tariff Item No. 84.06, even if the crankshafts themselves were assessed under Tariff Item No. 84.63. The notification was read with the later clarificatory Notification No. 29-Cus./77 and prior administrative decisions, and the decisive test was intended use rather than the tariff classification of the parts themselves. On that construction, the wider exemption was applied to parts proved to be destined for the specified engines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>