<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 260 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167253</link>
    <description>Exemption and rebate notifications in excise must be strictly construed, and the expression &quot;duty leviable&quot; is tied to the duty actually payable when goods are removed from the factory. The rebate therefore had to be computed by reference to the tariff valuation and duty in force on the date of clearance, not an abstract fixed rate divorced from the statutory scheme. The incentive character of the notification did not justify extending its scope on equitable grounds. The restricted rebate was upheld and the assessee&#039;s claim for the larger amount failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:32:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 260 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167253</link>
      <description>Exemption and rebate notifications in excise must be strictly construed, and the expression &quot;duty leviable&quot; is tied to the duty actually payable when goods are removed from the factory. The rebate therefore had to be computed by reference to the tariff valuation and duty in force on the date of clearance, not an abstract fixed rate divorced from the statutory scheme. The incentive character of the notification did not justify extending its scope on equitable grounds. The restricted rebate was upheld and the assessee&#039;s claim for the larger amount failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>