<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 297 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeals, determining that Polyethylene Glycol 300 (PEG 300), Polypropylene Glycol (PPG 1010), and PPG 2020 were correctly classified under heading 38.01/19(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as miscellaneous chemical products. The products did not meet the criteria for classification under heading 39.01/06 as resinous or plastic materials. The issue of additional duty was deemed irrelevant due to the classification outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:46:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 297 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeals, determining that Polyethylene Glycol 300 (PEG 300), Polypropylene Glycol (PPG 1010), and PPG 2020 were correctly classified under heading 38.01/19(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as miscellaneous chemical products. The products did not meet the criteria for classification under heading 39.01/06 as resinous or plastic materials. The issue of additional duty was deemed irrelevant due to the classification outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>