<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 461 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the extended period can be invoked even if penalties under Section 78 were waived for the appellant under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision emphasized the need to prove reasonable cause for failure and highlighted that Section 80 overrides Section 78 in certain situations. The appellant&#039;s appeal was rejected as they failed to demonstrate any confusion or reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax on Rent-a-Cab services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 461 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the extended period can be invoked even if penalties under Section 78 were waived for the appellant under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision emphasized the need to prove reasonable cause for failure and highlighted that Section 80 overrides Section 78 in certain situations. The appellant&#039;s appeal was rejected as they failed to demonstrate any confusion or reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax on Rent-a-Cab services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>