https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254116 The High Court allowed the extension of stay beyond 365 days under Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, provided the appellant did not cause delays and cooperated in the appeal process. The Court mandated that the Appellate Tribunal must issue detailed speaking orders for each extension request, considering factors like appellant cooperation and absence of delay tactics. Non-speaking orders were to be remanded for reconsideration. The Tribunal was directed to review stay extensions every 180 days, ensuring timely disposal of appeals. All cases were remanded for fresh orders within a set timeframe, with stay orders remaining in effect during review. en-us Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:54:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254116 The High Court allowed the extension of stay beyond 365 days under Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, provided the appellant did not cause delays and cooperated in the appeal process. The Court mandated that the Appellate Tribunal must issue detailed speaking orders for each extension request, considering factors like appellant cooperation and absence of delay tactics. Non-speaking orders were to be remanded for reconsideration. The Tribunal was directed to review stay extensions every 180 days, ensuring timely disposal of appeals. All cases were remanded for fresh orders within a set timeframe, with stay orders remaining in effect during review. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254116