<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 457 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, holding that if a penalty under Section 78 had been imposed, penalty under Section 76 would not apply. The appellants were found to have willfully evaded service tax, justifying the imposition of penalty under Section 78, but were granted the option to pay a reduced penalty of 25% within 30 days. The appellants could avail of the reduced penalty if paid within the specified timeframe and fulfilled the conditions outlined in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 457 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding penalties under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, holding that if a penalty under Section 78 had been imposed, penalty under Section 76 would not apply. The appellants were found to have willfully evaded service tax, justifying the imposition of penalty under Section 78, but were granted the option to pay a reduced penalty of 25% within 30 days. The appellants could avail of the reduced penalty if paid within the specified timeframe and fulfilled the conditions outlined in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>