<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 437 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254093</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed with modifications in the transfer pricing adjustments for royalty payment and disallowance of provision for service warranty. Other grounds were dismissed or upheld based on the tribunal&#039;s consistent view and legal precedents. The matter was sent back to the Transfer Pricing Officer/Assessing Officer for decision in line with the Special Bench verdict on AMP expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 437 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254093</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed with modifications in the transfer pricing adjustments for royalty payment and disallowance of provision for service warranty. Other grounds were dismissed or upheld based on the tribunal&#039;s consistent view and legal precedents. The matter was sent back to the Transfer Pricing Officer/Assessing Officer for decision in line with the Special Bench verdict on AMP expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>