<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 434 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was deemed unjustified as the AO had conducted adequate inquiry and correctly accepted the books of account. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the CIT&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 434 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was deemed unjustified as the AO had conducted adequate inquiry and correctly accepted the books of account. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the CIT&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>