<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 428 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254084</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the arm&#039;s length price adjustment using the LIBOR rate and to reappraise the disallowance of interest expenditure, allowing the assessee to present further evidence. The additional ground regarding the notional corporate guarantee fee was dismissed as premature. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 428 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254084</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the arm&#039;s length price adjustment using the LIBOR rate and to reappraise the disallowance of interest expenditure, allowing the assessee to present further evidence. The additional ground regarding the notional corporate guarantee fee was dismissed as premature. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>