<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 405 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254061</link>
    <description>Exemption for motor vehicles manufactured on supplied chassis was held available where the notification covered vehicles made by a manufacturer other than the chassis manufacturer and required only that no CENVAT credit be taken on the chassis. The distinction between a condition requiring proof that duty on the chassis was paid and a condition omitting that requirement was treated as material, so non-production of duty payment evidence did not defeat the exemption. Once the exemption applied, the chassis value had to be excluded from the assessable value, and the principal-manufacturer sale value could not be adopted for duty computation at that stage. Pre-deposit was waived and stay against recovery granted pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 405 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254061</link>
      <description>Exemption for motor vehicles manufactured on supplied chassis was held available where the notification covered vehicles made by a manufacturer other than the chassis manufacturer and required only that no CENVAT credit be taken on the chassis. The distinction between a condition requiring proof that duty on the chassis was paid and a condition omitting that requirement was treated as material, so non-production of duty payment evidence did not defeat the exemption. Once the exemption applied, the chassis value had to be excluded from the assessable value, and the principal-manufacturer sale value could not be adopted for duty computation at that stage. Pre-deposit was waived and stay against recovery granted pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>