<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 402 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254058</link>
    <description>Customs authorities were directed to consider the importer&#039;s representation seeking release of detained goods and to pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within three weeks. The Court confined relief to consideration of the representation and did not examine the merits of the alleged requirements under the Legal Metrology Regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 402 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254058</link>
      <description>Customs authorities were directed to consider the importer&#039;s representation seeking release of detained goods and to pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within three weeks. The Court confined relief to consideration of the representation and did not examine the merits of the alleged requirements under the Legal Metrology Regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>