<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 222 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal in a case involving interpretation of exemption notifications under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The inclusion of &#039;buildings&#039; in capital investment for excise duty calculation was deemed erroneous, leading to a violation of natural justice. The appellants, manufacturers of link chains, successfully challenged the decision, as the Collector (Appeals) introduced a new factor without proper notice, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:49:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 222 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal in a case involving interpretation of exemption notifications under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The inclusion of &#039;buildings&#039; in capital investment for excise duty calculation was deemed erroneous, leading to a violation of natural justice. The appellants, manufacturers of link chains, successfully challenged the decision, as the Collector (Appeals) introduced a new factor without proper notice, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>