<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 218 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167199</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction to decide the appeal challenging the order under Section 129A(1)(c) of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s request for condonation of delay in filing the appeal was rejected as the reasons provided were not considered sufficient under Section 129A(5) of the Customs Act. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:50:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 218 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167199</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction to decide the appeal challenging the order under Section 129A(1)(c) of the Customs Act. The appellant&#039;s request for condonation of delay in filing the appeal was rejected as the reasons provided were not considered sufficient under Section 129A(5) of the Customs Act. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>