<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 283 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167191</link>
    <description>Supply of A.D. wet cells in unassembled or knocked-down form was not treated as manufacture of complete cells where the record showed that only carbon and zinc elements were made in-house and the remaining parts were bought out and dispatched without assembly. On those facts, the view that an unassembled supply amounted to manufacture of the finished article was rejected, so duty on the alleged complete cells could not stand. Exemption under Notification No. 179/77 was also denied because power was used in manufacturing essential components of the cells, meaning the goods could not qualify as products not ordinarily produced with the aid of power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:49:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 283 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167191</link>
      <description>Supply of A.D. wet cells in unassembled or knocked-down form was not treated as manufacture of complete cells where the record showed that only carbon and zinc elements were made in-house and the remaining parts were bought out and dispatched without assembly. On those facts, the view that an unassembled supply amounted to manufacture of the finished article was rejected, so duty on the alleged complete cells could not stand. Exemption under Notification No. 179/77 was also denied because power was used in manufacturing essential components of the cells, meaning the goods could not qualify as products not ordinarily produced with the aid of power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>