<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 332 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167185</link>
    <description>Bona fide conduct and the absence of mens rea are treated as central to liability under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, even where a statutory presumption of culpable mental state exists under section 59. The commentary also notes a separate argument on the exception in section 9(2)(b) for payments linked to salary or services not arising from business or acts done in India, but records that this plea was not clearly adjudicated by the authorities below. The stated ratio is that, where the conduct is accepted as bona fide, a charge under the Act cannot be sustained without proof of the requisite culpable mental state.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:38:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 332 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167185</link>
      <description>Bona fide conduct and the absence of mens rea are treated as central to liability under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, even where a statutory presumption of culpable mental state exists under section 59. The commentary also notes a separate argument on the exception in section 9(2)(b) for payments linked to salary or services not arising from business or acts done in India, but records that this plea was not clearly adjudicated by the authorities below. The stated ratio is that, where the conduct is accepted as bona fide, a charge under the Act cannot be sustained without proof of the requisite culpable mental state.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>