<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 396 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254052</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars require the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction to arise during assessment. Section 271(1B) deems such satisfaction where the assessment order contains a direction to initiate penalty proceedings. Where the assessment order contains no indication of initiation or recorded satisfaction, initiation is untenable. Acceptance of additions or payment of tax does not cure that defect or independently justify penalty. A later Supreme Court decision cited by the Revenue does not alter this position where it did not address an assessment order silent on penalty initiation. Consequently, penalty cannot be sustained without the requisite assessment-order endorsement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 396 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254052</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars require the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction to arise during assessment. Section 271(1B) deems such satisfaction where the assessment order contains a direction to initiate penalty proceedings. Where the assessment order contains no indication of initiation or recorded satisfaction, initiation is untenable. Acceptance of additions or payment of tax does not cure that defect or independently justify penalty. A later Supreme Court decision cited by the Revenue does not alter this position where it did not address an assessment order silent on penalty initiation. Consequently, penalty cannot be sustained without the requisite assessment-order endorsement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>