<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 371 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed pre-deposit of approximately 10.5 Lakhs towards the demand for service tax and penalties, finding no prima facie case against the demand for the normal period. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit the remaining amount related to the disputed demand for site formation and clearance service. For the construction of Yanam Obelisk Tower, as the service tax amount was already paid, no further action was required. Waiver and stay were granted against the demand for the construction of Jack Well for the SEZ Unit due to revenue neutrality. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit a certain percentage of the demand amount for activities at an onshore gas terminal. Compliance with the pre-deposit directive within the set deadline would result in a waiver and stay against the remaining dues and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 371 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed pre-deposit of approximately 10.5 Lakhs towards the demand for service tax and penalties, finding no prima facie case against the demand for the normal period. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit the remaining amount related to the disputed demand for site formation and clearance service. For the construction of Yanam Obelisk Tower, as the service tax amount was already paid, no further action was required. Waiver and stay were granted against the demand for the construction of Jack Well for the SEZ Unit due to revenue neutrality. The appellant was directed to pre-deposit a certain percentage of the demand amount for activities at an onshore gas terminal. Compliance with the pre-deposit directive within the set deadline would result in a waiver and stay against the remaining dues and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>