<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 360 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254016</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to impose a penalty, finding the importer&#039;s conduct in misdeclaring goods and attempting to evade duty warranted such action. The appeal by the Department was allowed, reinforcing the applicability of penalties for improper importation despite the abandonment of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 360 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254016</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to impose a penalty, finding the importer&#039;s conduct in misdeclaring goods and attempting to evade duty warranted such action. The appeal by the Department was allowed, reinforcing the applicability of penalties for improper importation despite the abandonment of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>