https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254013 The Court found the disciplinary authority grossly violated natural justice principles by not allowing the petitioner to respond to points of disagreement. The order was quashed, directing the authority to notify the petitioner of differences and permit a response. The decision did not affect the disciplinary merits but addressed procedural faults. The circular revoking the petitioner's license, linked to the order, was annulled. The writ petition was resolved without costs, instructing parties to follow counsel communications. en-us Thu, 15 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254013 The Court found the disciplinary authority grossly violated natural justice principles by not allowing the petitioner to respond to points of disagreement. The order was quashed, directing the authority to notify the petitioner of differences and permit a response. The decision did not affect the disciplinary merits but addressed procedural faults. The circular revoking the petitioner's license, linked to the order, was annulled. The writ petition was resolved without costs, instructing parties to follow counsel communications. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254013