<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 335 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253991</link>
    <description>Credible third-party material indicating that an assessee was a beneficiary of an offshore trust can justify reassessment where the reasons recorded are furnished, translated documents are supplied, and adequate opportunities are given; on those facts, a procedural challenge for breach of natural justice fails. The trust account records, foreign-investigation material, and surrounding documents may also establish beneficial ownership and nondisclosure, so the trust balance and related income can be treated as unexplained and taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands even if no amount was directly credited in the assessee&#039;s name. On this reasoning, the reopening is upheld and the addition is sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 335 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253991</link>
      <description>Credible third-party material indicating that an assessee was a beneficiary of an offshore trust can justify reassessment where the reasons recorded are furnished, translated documents are supplied, and adequate opportunities are given; on those facts, a procedural challenge for breach of natural justice fails. The trust account records, foreign-investigation material, and surrounding documents may also establish beneficial ownership and nondisclosure, so the trust balance and related income can be treated as unexplained and taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands even if no amount was directly credited in the assessee&#039;s name. On this reasoning, the reopening is upheld and the addition is sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>