https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167166 The appeal concerning the classification of an imported colour scanner under the Customs Tariff Act was dismissed by the Tribunal. The scanner was classified under Heading 90.10 for apparatus used in photographic or cinematographic laboratories, rejecting the appellants' argument for classification under Heading 84.35 as printing machinery ancillary. The Tribunal found the scanner's functions aligned with the classification under Chapter 90, supported by Notification 36/81. The duty charge of &8377; 7,60,032.72 was upheld based on the determined classification, emphasizing compliance with the Customs Tariff Act. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:51:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167166 The appeal concerning the classification of an imported colour scanner under the Customs Tariff Act was dismissed by the Tribunal. The scanner was classified under Heading 90.10 for apparatus used in photographic or cinematographic laboratories, rejecting the appellants' argument for classification under Heading 84.35 as printing machinery ancillary. The Tribunal found the scanner's functions aligned with the classification under Chapter 90, supported by Notification 36/81. The duty charge of &8377; 7,60,032.72 was upheld based on the determined classification, emphasizing compliance with the Customs Tariff Act. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167166