<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 332 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167147</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal involving the determination of the rate of duty. The case was directed to be transferred to the Special Bench in New Delhi for appropriate adjudication. The judgment emphasized the necessity of adhering to statutory jurisdictional requirements, particularly in cases concerning the rate of duty, which must be addressed by the designated Special Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:02:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 332 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167147</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal involving the determination of the rate of duty. The case was directed to be transferred to the Special Bench in New Delhi for appropriate adjudication. The judgment emphasized the necessity of adhering to statutory jurisdictional requirements, particularly in cases concerning the rate of duty, which must be addressed by the designated Special Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>