<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 331 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253987</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal seeking rectification of a mistake apparent in the Order-in-Original. It held that the appellants were not entitled to a hearing as the impugned order did not adversely affect them. The Tribunal emphasized that the figures provided during adjudication were final, and subsequent submissions were not considered. Relying on precedent, it clarified that a mistake apparent from the record should be self-evident. Since no error was found in the adjudication records, the appeal was rejected, affirming the legality of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 331 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253987</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal seeking rectification of a mistake apparent in the Order-in-Original. It held that the appellants were not entitled to a hearing as the impugned order did not adversely affect them. The Tribunal emphasized that the figures provided during adjudication were final, and subsequent submissions were not considered. Relying on precedent, it clarified that a mistake apparent from the record should be self-evident. Since no error was found in the adjudication records, the appeal was rejected, affirming the legality of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>