<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 320 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The direction to delete the addition was upheld, emphasizing the consistent treatment of the assessee as AOP, the inapplicability of section 194C, the principle of revenue sharing consistency, and the prevention of double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 320 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The direction to delete the addition was upheld, emphasizing the consistent treatment of the assessee as AOP, the inapplicability of section 194C, the principle of revenue sharing consistency, and the prevention of double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>