<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It confirmed the validity of the joint venture&#039;s revenue sharing method, ruling that TDS deduction under section 194C was not required. Emphasizing consistency and avoiding double taxation, the Tribunal aligned with judicial precedents. The judgment was pronounced on August 22, 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It confirmed the validity of the joint venture&#039;s revenue sharing method, ruling that TDS deduction under section 194C was not required. Emphasizing consistency and avoiding double taxation, the Tribunal aligned with judicial precedents. The judgment was pronounced on August 22, 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>