<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 301 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253957</link>
    <description>Capital gains were not attracted on an agreement to sell-cum-irrevocable power of attorney where consideration was not received, possession was not handed over, and the agreement was later cancelled by registered deed, because no completed transfer was proved. Deduction under section 54F required fresh factual enquiry since the nature of the new construction as a residential house was not conclusively established and its use as hostel accommodation was not enough by itself. Deduction under section 54B was sustained because the purchased lands were shown by documentary and revenue records to be agricultural lands, and no notified-limit disqualification was proved. Additions treating part of disclosed agricultural income as income from other sources were rejected as based on estimate rather than evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 21:17:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 301 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253957</link>
      <description>Capital gains were not attracted on an agreement to sell-cum-irrevocable power of attorney where consideration was not received, possession was not handed over, and the agreement was later cancelled by registered deed, because no completed transfer was proved. Deduction under section 54F required fresh factual enquiry since the nature of the new construction as a residential house was not conclusively established and its use as hostel accommodation was not enough by itself. Deduction under section 54B was sustained because the purchased lands were shown by documentary and revenue records to be agricultural lands, and no notified-limit disqualification was proved. Additions treating part of disclosed agricultural income as income from other sources were rejected as based on estimate rather than evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>