<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 292 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 3,87,27,750 and Rs. 35,76,010, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The amounts were recognized as advances for future services, either accounted for as income in subsequent years or refunded, following the completed service contract method. The Tribunal found the transactions substantiated through proper documentation and creditor confirmations, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order based on these grounds. The decision was rendered on 31st October, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 292 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 3,87,27,750 and Rs. 35,76,010, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The amounts were recognized as advances for future services, either accounted for as income in subsequent years or refunded, following the completed service contract method. The Tribunal found the transactions substantiated through proper documentation and creditor confirmations, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order based on these grounds. The decision was rendered on 31st October, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>