<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 287 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253943</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on the appellant for providing &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; in the sale and purchase of used cars. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s role akin to that of a &#039;Commission Agent&#039; based on the services rendered, despite the appellant&#039;s contention otherwise. The decision highlighted the nuanced interpretation of legal definitions and the need for a deeper understanding of the trade practices involved in determining tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 18:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 287 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253943</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on the appellant for providing &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; in the sale and purchase of used cars. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the appellant&#039;s role akin to that of a &#039;Commission Agent&#039; based on the services rendered, despite the appellant&#039;s contention otherwise. The decision highlighted the nuanced interpretation of legal definitions and the need for a deeper understanding of the trade practices involved in determining tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>