<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 279 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253935</link>
    <description>The case involved issues regarding the recovery of Modvat credit, duty, and Cenvat credit on goods destroyed by fire. The Tribunal and Commissioner (Appeals) allowed appeals by the assessee based on proper documentation, including Insurance certificates clarifying the non-inclusion of duty element in claimed credits. The judgments emphasized compliance with legal provisions and Circulars, permitting remission of duty on final products even if credits were availed on inputs. The decisions were supported by relevant case laws and High Court judgments, leading to the rejection of Revenue&#039;s appeals due to lack of contrary evidence against Insurance certificates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 279 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253935</link>
      <description>The case involved issues regarding the recovery of Modvat credit, duty, and Cenvat credit on goods destroyed by fire. The Tribunal and Commissioner (Appeals) allowed appeals by the assessee based on proper documentation, including Insurance certificates clarifying the non-inclusion of duty element in claimed credits. The judgments emphasized compliance with legal provisions and Circulars, permitting remission of duty on final products even if credits were availed on inputs. The decisions were supported by relevant case laws and High Court judgments, leading to the rejection of Revenue&#039;s appeals due to lack of contrary evidence against Insurance certificates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>