<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 272 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253928</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision that the department cannot unilaterally order provisional assessment under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rule, 2002. The Tribunal clarified that the rule allows an assessee to request provisional assessment, with the department having the authority to demand differential duty or resort to the &#039;best judgment&#039; method if necessary. The appeal by the Revenue challenging this decision was dismissed as legally unsustainable, emphasizing the procedural requirements for provisional assessment when the assessee is unable to determine duty values or rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 272 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253928</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision that the department cannot unilaterally order provisional assessment under Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rule, 2002. The Tribunal clarified that the rule allows an assessee to request provisional assessment, with the department having the authority to demand differential duty or resort to the &#039;best judgment&#039; method if necessary. The appeal by the Revenue challenging this decision was dismissed as legally unsustainable, emphasizing the procedural requirements for provisional assessment when the assessee is unable to determine duty values or rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>