<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 264 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253920</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the determination of the date of property acquisition under Section 2(42A) of the Income Tax Act. It upheld the significance of the date of allotment letter over the registration date, following Circular No.471. The Court emphasized that the allotment letter establishes property rights, with possession being secondary. The decision aligned with previous interpretations, stating that breach of agreement only entitles enforcement of property rights. The holding period for capital gains was based on the allotment date, not possession delivery, as per the Court&#039;s ruling, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 264 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253920</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the determination of the date of property acquisition under Section 2(42A) of the Income Tax Act. It upheld the significance of the date of allotment letter over the registration date, following Circular No.471. The Court emphasized that the allotment letter establishes property rights, with possession being secondary. The decision aligned with previous interpretations, stating that breach of agreement only entitles enforcement of property rights. The holding period for capital gains was based on the allotment date, not possession delivery, as per the Court&#039;s ruling, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>