<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Confiscation of Goods Doesn&#039;t Violate Natural Justice; Cross-Examination Rights Depend on Specific Case Facts.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20912</link>
    <description>Confiscation of goods - breach of principles of natural justice or not - It will not be correct to hold that irrespective of the facts and circumstances and in all inquiries, the right of cross examination can be asserted. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2014 18:24:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2014 18:24:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Confiscation of Goods Doesn&#039;t Violate Natural Justice; Cross-Examination Rights Depend on Specific Case Facts.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20912</link>
      <description>Confiscation of goods - breach of principles of natural justice or not - It will not be correct to hold that irrespective of the facts and circumstances and in all inquiries, the right of cross examination can be asserted. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2014 18:24:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=20912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>