<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 246 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253902</link>
    <description>Sufficient cause was found to recall an ex parte stay order and restore the stay application to its original number. On the request for waiver of predeposit, complete relief was refused because the appellant had not established a strong prima facie case on merits; an earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case had gone against it, the High Court&#039;s order was only temporary, and the disputed period preceded the relied-upon circular. Partial conditional relief was granted instead: the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 50,00,000 within eight weeks, with the balance waived and recovery stayed during the appeal on compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2014 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 246 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253902</link>
      <description>Sufficient cause was found to recall an ex parte stay order and restore the stay application to its original number. On the request for waiver of predeposit, complete relief was refused because the appellant had not established a strong prima facie case on merits; an earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case had gone against it, the High Court&#039;s order was only temporary, and the disputed period preceded the relied-upon circular. Partial conditional relief was granted instead: the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 50,00,000 within eight weeks, with the balance waived and recovery stayed during the appeal on compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>