<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 234 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow turnover and trade discounts for deduction in the provisional assessment, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It clarified that collecting the full duty amount from buyers did not preclude the respondent from claiming deductions, citing relevant case law. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between finalizing the assessment and refund eligibility, finding the Revenue&#039;s arguments lacking merit and highlighting the importance of recognizing trade discounts for deduction purposes. The appeal and stay application were both dismissed, affirming the deductions in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2014 15:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 234 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to allow turnover and trade discounts for deduction in the provisional assessment, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It clarified that collecting the full duty amount from buyers did not preclude the respondent from claiming deductions, citing relevant case law. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between finalizing the assessment and refund eligibility, finding the Revenue&#039;s arguments lacking merit and highlighting the importance of recognizing trade discounts for deduction purposes. The appeal and stay application were both dismissed, affirming the deductions in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>