<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 231 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253887</link>
    <description>The appellate Commissioner upheld the liability to Excise Duty and penalty under Section 11AC, citing the appellant&#039;s suppression of material facts as the reason for invoking the extended period of limitation. The Tribunal confirmed the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC, emphasizing that the penalty applies when duty evasion is established. The confirmation of duty liability and penalty imposition were deemed legitimate based on the appellant&#039;s conduct. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2014 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 231 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253887</link>
      <description>The appellate Commissioner upheld the liability to Excise Duty and penalty under Section 11AC, citing the appellant&#039;s suppression of material facts as the reason for invoking the extended period of limitation. The Tribunal confirmed the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC, emphasizing that the penalty applies when duty evasion is established. The confirmation of duty liability and penalty imposition were deemed legitimate based on the appellant&#039;s conduct. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>