https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253883 Omission of the first, second and third provisos to Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act removed the statutory mechanism for filing and deciding further applications for extension of stay, so no fresh extension application was required. However, the omission did not cause an existing stay order, already granted under Section 35C(2A), to lapse automatically for want of a saving clause. The stay continued to operate until disposal of the appeals, while the appeals themselves still had to be decided within the statutory period. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2015 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253883 Omission of the first, second and third provisos to Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act removed the statutory mechanism for filing and deciding further applications for extension of stay, so no fresh extension application was required. However, the omission did not cause an existing stay order, already granted under Section 35C(2A), to lapse automatically for want of a saving clause. The stay continued to operate until disposal of the appeals, while the appeals themselves still had to be decided within the statutory period. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253883