<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 387 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167129</link>
    <description>Fabricated storage tanks, steam trap tanks, pipe and pipe fittings erected at site were treated as infrastructure-type items rather than complete machinery, so they fell within the exemption under Notification No. 118/75-C.E. and were not liable to excise duty. The remaining disputed items were held dutiable. The question whether items valued at Rs. 10,39,407 were manufactured in premises amounting to a factory under the Factories Act, 1948 was not finally resolved and was left for further inquiry and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=370379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 387 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167129</link>
      <description>Fabricated storage tanks, steam trap tanks, pipe and pipe fittings erected at site were treated as infrastructure-type items rather than complete machinery, so they fell within the exemption under Notification No. 118/75-C.E. and were not liable to excise duty. The remaining disputed items were held dutiable. The question whether items valued at Rs. 10,39,407 were manufactured in premises amounting to a factory under the Factories Act, 1948 was not finally resolved and was left for further inquiry and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>