https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167128 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the order of dismissal of the stay application, citing the absence of statutory authority for staying recovery of disputed amounts and the failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F. The Tribunal clarified the limitations on exercising incidental or ancillary powers and the inapplicability of Section 35A to interlocutory orders. Emphasizing the need for a clear statutory basis for appeal, the Tribunal upheld the Departmental Representative's objection, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 16 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:34:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167128 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the order of dismissal of the stay application, citing the absence of statutory authority for staying recovery of disputed amounts and the failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F. The Tribunal clarified the limitations on exercising incidental or ancillary powers and the inapplicability of Section 35A to interlocutory orders. Emphasizing the need for a clear statutory basis for appeal, the Tribunal upheld the Departmental Representative's objection, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167128