https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167125 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether a material part of the cause of action, meaning the bundle of facts necessary to succeed, arose within the court's territory. A writ challenge to a Central Government levy sugar price fixation order was held not maintainable where the impugned order was made in New Delhi and the levy sugar was to be sold and delivered at the mill gate in Bihar. The petitioners' head office, godown, shareholder residence, and alleged financial prejudice in West Bengal were only incidental and did not constitute material facts forming the cause of action. en-us Thu, 09 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Dec 2014 15:17:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167125 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 depends on whether a material part of the cause of action, meaning the bundle of facts necessary to succeed, arose within the court's territory. A writ challenge to a Central Government levy sugar price fixation order was held not maintainable where the impugned order was made in New Delhi and the levy sugar was to be sold and delivered at the mill gate in Bihar. The petitioners' head office, godown, shareholder residence, and alleged financial prejudice in West Bengal were only incidental and did not constitute material facts forming the cause of action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167125